Peer Review reports
From: The validation of prediction models deserves more recognition
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Mar 2024 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 May 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 16 May 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Borja M. Fernandez-Felix |
| 4 Jul 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrich Mansmann |
| 20 Jul 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Aug 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 17 Oct 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 16 Nov 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrich Mansmann |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 Jul 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 16 Dec 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 17 Dec 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 14 Jan 2025 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Feb 2025 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrich Mansmann |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Feb 2025 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 28 Feb 2025 | Author responded | Author comments - Ulrich Mansmann |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Feb 2025 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Mar 2025 | Editorially accepted | |
| 18 Mar 2025 | Article published | 10.1186/s12916-025-03994-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.