Skip to main content

Table 2 Key characteristics of included studies

From: Patient-physician communication of health and risk information in the management of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a systematic scoping review

No

Author (year)/country

Study design/methodological orientationa

Data collection

method

Primary/secondary setting

Specific study setting

Participant characteristicsb

Sample sizec

Specific CVD/diabetes condition (if stated)

CVD

1

Adarkwah et al. (2016) [41]/Germany

Randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Primary

GPs

â–ª Patients from GPs who are affiliated with the Department of Primary Care at the University of Marburg

â–ª 32 GPs in 28 practices included an average of 9.5 patients (ranging from 3 to 15 each)

▪ Mean age (TTE): 57.83 years old

▪ Mean age (Emoticons): 58.01 years old

Intervention group:

157 patients

Control group:

147 patients

N.A.

2

Adarkwah et al. (2019) [42]/Germany

Randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Primary

GPs

â–ª Same as Adarkwah et al. (2016) [41]

▪ Mean age (TTE): 58.2 years old

▪ Mean age (Emoticons): 58.24 years old

Intervention group:

148 patients (analysed)

Control group:

146 patients (analysed)

N.A.

3

Barfoed et al. (2015) [43]/Denmark

Systematic text condensation

Semi-structured interviews

Primary

GPs

â–ª GPs from the capital and southern region of Denmark

▪ 3 GPs age < 50 years old; 7 ≥ 50 years old

10 GPs

N.A.

4

Bengtsson et al. (2021) [44]/Sweden

Qualitative content analysis

Semi-structured interviews

Primary

GPs

GPs practicing in Veasterbotten County, Sweden

15 GPs

N.A.

5

Bonner et al. (2014) [45]/Australia

Framework analysis

Semi-structured interviews

Primary

GPs

â–ª Practising GPs from 8 divisions of General Practice in metropolitan areas of New South Wales, Australia

6 GPs aged < 40 years old, 8 between 40 and 49 years old, 7 between 50 and 59 years old, and 4 aged > 60 years old

25 GPs

N.A.

6

Borg Xuereb et al. (2016) [46]/UK

Interpretative phenomenology

Semi-structured interviews

Secondary

AF Clinics

â–ª Physicians with experience managing patients with AF and have prescribed warfarin

â–ª Patients from AF clinics, and physicians from primary and secondary care settings in the West Midlands, UK

â–ª Patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) and who had accepted, declined or discontinued warfarin

▪ Physicians aged between 32 and 60 years old

Patients aged between 53 and 83 years old

11 patients

16 physicians

Atrial fibrillation

7

Bridgwood et al. (2020) [47]/UK

Constant comparative method

Non-participant observation/semi-structured interviews

Secondary

TIA Clinics

â–ª Consultations were observed where transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were confirmed, at 3 different outpatient clinics in the East Midlands

8 patients < 65 years old, 7 patients > 65 years old

15 consultations with 9 stroke specialists observed

15 patients, with

12 accompanying relatives

Transient ischemic attack

8

Casebeer et al. (2009) [48]/USA

Controlled trial

Surveys/patient electronic records

Primary and secondary

Not stated

â–ª Patients were enrolled when they visited their physician

▪ Mean age of patients in the larger study cohort is 58 years old

Intervention group:

355 patients

Control group:

196 patients

N.A.

9

Durack-Brown et al. (2003) [49]/France

Not stated

Semi-structured interviews

Primary and secondary

GPs and specialist consultants

â–ª Physicians who are primary care physicians and treated hypercholesterolaemia patients regularly

â–ª Patients with high cholesterol levels treated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

▪ Patients aged between 31 and 71 years old

27 patients

21 physicians

N.A.

10

Fisseni et al. (2008) [50]/Germany

Qualitative content analysis

Semi-structured interviews

Primary

GPs

â–ª GPs picked randomly, from the North-Rhine region

â–ª Laypeople from the German Heart Foundation

▪ Aged between 23 and 78 years old

6 GPs

4 healthcare assistants

12 laypeople

N.A.

11

Goodyear-Smith et al. (2011) [51]/New Zealand

Cross-sectional survey

Surveys

Primary

Family practice

â–ª Patients attending 9 family practices in Auckland, including 2 practices with a high proportion of Maori and Pacific Islanders

â–ª Mean age of patients

31–40 years old: 44 (4.7%)

41–50 years old: 199

(21.3%)

51–60 years old: 273

(29.2%)

61–70 years old: 23 (25.4%)

 > 70 years old: 181 (19.4%)

934 patients

N.A.

12

Hawking et al. (2019) [52]/UK

Thematic analysis

Semi-structured interviews

Primary

GPs

â–ª Low and medium CVD risk participants, identified from 6 GPs, the majority of whom were from black and ethnic minority backgrounds reflecting the Newham Borough population

▪ Aged between 40 and 64 years old

18 patients

N.A.

13

Honey et al. (2015) [53]/UK

Qualitative descriptive study

Qualitative descriptive interviews

Primary

GPs

â–ª Identified from the databases of 7 GP practices in a city in the northern UK, with a high 10-year CVD risk

▪ Aged between 40 and 74 years old

37 patients

N.A.

14

Kirby and Machen (2009) [54]/UK

Cross-sectional survey/thematic analysis

Phase 1:

surveys

Phase 2:

focus group discussions

Primary

GPs

â–ª GPs in Hertfordshire and nationwide

Phase 1

(nationwide survey results reported only)

202 GPs recalled using Factfile (out of 600 GPs from the national sample)

181 GPs who accessed the risk calculator

Phase 2:

17 GPs

4 practice nurses

1 nurse practitioner

N.A.

15

Krones et al. (2008) [55]/Germany

Randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Primary

Family practice

â–ª Physicians from CME groups in Hessen

▪ Patients have had their cholesterol levels measured during a period of 4 weeks

▪ Mean age of patients (intervention group): 59.1 years old

▪ Mean age of patients (control group): 58.6 years old

Intervention group:

550 patients

(at index consultation)

460 patients

(at follow-up)

Control group:

582 patients

(at index consultation)

466 patients

(at follow-up)

N.A.

16

Polak and Green (2015) [56]/UK

Constant comparative method

Semi-structured interviews

Primary and secondary

Not stated

â–ª Participants recruited and interviewed face to face in community settings, mostly in their homes, in East Anglia

▪ All participants had been offered a statin for either primary (n = 17) or secondary prevention (n = 17); over half (n = 22) currently taking statins

▪ Aged between 53 and 87 years old

34 patientsd

N.A.

17

Roach et al. (2010) [57]/USA

Randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Primary

Not stated

▪ Mean age of patients (intervention group): 57.1 years old

▪ Mean age of patients (control group): 57.8 years old

Intervention group:

51 patients

Control group:

47 patients

N.A.

18

Rosal et al. (2004) [58]/USA

Constant comparative method

Focus group discussions

Primary

Not stated

â–ª Participants were recruited from a variety of primary care settings, including a university teaching hospital, community health centre, private group practice, and large group model health maintenance organisation (HMO)

▪ 3 physicians aged between 26 and 35 years old, 7 physicians between 35 and 45 years old

11 physicians

N.A.

19

Salmasi et al. (2018) [59]/Canada

Qualitative descriptive study

Semi-structured interviews

Secondary

AF Clinics

â–ª Patients from 2 specialised AF clinics in Vancouver

â–ª Physicians who have been involved in the provision of care to AF patients for at least a year

▪ Patients aged > 18 years old with atrial fibrillation (AF)

11 clinicians

10 patients

Atrial Fibrillation

20

Tawfik et al. (2016) [60]/Egypt

Randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Primary

Family medicine outpatient clinic

▪ Mean age of patients (intervention group): 56.3 years old

▪ Mean age of patients (control group): 55.1 years old

Intervention group:

127 patients

(at allocation)

107 patients

(at follow-up)

Control group:

128 patients

(at allocation)

N.A.

21

van Steenkiste et al. (2004) [61]/Netherlands

Constant comparative method

Semi-structured in-depth interviews

Primary

GPs

â–ª Study conducted in the southern part of the Netherlands

â–ª GPs were asked to record 2 consultation sessions in which a CVD table was used

▪ Aged between 37 and 57 years old

15 GPs

N.A.

22

Welschen et al. (2012) [62]/Netherlandsd

Randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Primary

GPs

â–ª Patients from the Diabetes care system (DCS) in West-Friesland

â–ª DCS coordinates care and provides feedback to patients and specialists, as well as promotes patient empowerment in addition to 3 monthly GP care

▪ Mean age of patients (intervention group): 58.9 years old

▪ Mean age of patients (control group): 58.2 years old

Intervention group:

132 patients

Control group:

130 patients

N.A.

23

Williams et al. (2016) [63]/Indonesia

Interrupted time series

Surveys

Primary

Community health centres

â–ª 4 community health centres located in Yogyakarta, which provide free care under the National Health Insurance program

675 patients

N.A.

Diabetes

24

Denig et al. (2014) [64]/Netherlands

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Primary

GPs

â–ª Patients with Type 2 Diabetes who are managed in primary care, from 18 general practices in the north of the Netherlands

▪ Mean age of patients (Intervention Group): 61.8 years old

▪ Mean age of patients (Control Group): 61.5 years old

Intervention group

225 patients

(at allocation)

199

(analysed for primary outcomes)

Control group (usual care)

119 patients

(at allocation)

107 patients (analysed for primary outcomes)

N.A.

25

Huang et al. (2016) [65]/USA

Pilot randomised trial

Surveys

Secondary

Clinics at a university

â–ª Patients with type 2 diabetes from 2 clinics at the University of Chicago

▪ Mean age of patients (intervention group): 74.5 years old

▪ Mean age of patients (control group): 72.4 years old

Intervention group

75 patients

(at allocation and analysed)

Control group:

25 patients

(at allocation and analysed)

N.A.

26

Ledford (2011) [66]/USA

Grounded theory

Semi-structured interviews

Secondary

Teaching hospitals

â–ª Physicians were staff from teaching hospitals

12 physicians

N.A.

27

Lyles et al. (2012) [67]/USA

Cross-sectional survey

Surveys

Primary

Not stated

â–ª Adult with type 1 or type 2 diabetes from 5 primary care clinics in Washington

Patient’s age:

▪ < 50 years old: 57 patients

▪ 50–64 years old: 224 patients

▪ ≥ 65 years old: 286 patients

569 patients

N.A.

28

Ritholz et al. (2017) [68]/USA

Cross-sectional survey

Surveys

Secondary

Diabetes centre

â–ª Receiving care at the Joslin Diabetes Centre in Boston

▪ Aged between 25 and 85 years old

▪ Participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes of ≥ 2 years duration

128 adults

N.A.

29

Rouyard et al. (2018) [69]/UK

Pilot randomised controlled trial

Surveys

Secondary

Surgery practice

▪ Adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c > 7.5% measured at least once during the past year), recruited from a surgery practice in Oxford

▪ Mean age of patients (intervention group): 57.4 years old

▪ Mean age of patients (control group): 61.1 years old

Intervention group

20 patients

(at allocation)

18 patients

(analysed at follow-up)

Control group

20 patients

(at allocation)

18 patients

(analysed at follow-up)

N.A.

30

Yao et al. (2022) [70]/China

Thematic analysis

Focus group discussions

Primary

Community health service centres

â–ª Type 2 diabetes patients from 5 community health service centres (GPs) in Guangzhou, China

▪ Average age of 57.3 years old

22 patients

N.A.

  1. aGiven that study design is often symbiotic with a methodological approach for qualitative studies than for quantitative studies, we report methodological orientation for qualitative studies in this column
  2. bThe specific location where participants were recruited from, and the mean age of participants are reported where available
  3. cFor RCTs, sample sizes are stated for analysis and follow-up groups where applicable
  4. dEven though interventions are delivered mainly by nurses and dieticians in Welschen et al. (2012) [62], since interventions are delivered in addition to care provided by GPs within a Diabetes Care System, and results of interventions are provided to participant’s GPs after being delivered to participants, we’ve decided to include this study in this scoping review
  5. eFor Polak and Green (2015) [56], participants were recruited in the community setting and were offered statins as part of primary and secondary prevention. Therefore, we assume that participants are most likely patients as well